Model-Based Diagnosis (MBD) is a principled and domain-independent way of analyzing why a system under examination is not behaving as expected. Given an abstract description (model) of the system's components and their behavior when functioning normally, MBD techniques rely on observations about the actual system behavior to reason about possible causes when there are discrepancies between the expected and observed behavior. Due to its generality, MBD has been successfully applied in a variety of application domains over the last decades.
In many application domains of MBD, testing different hypotheses about the reasons for a failure can be computationally costly, e.g., because complex simulations of the system behavior have to be performed. In this work, we therefore propose different schemes of parallelizing the diagnostic reasoning process in order to better exploit the capabilities of modern multi-core computers. We propose and systematically evaluate parallelization schemes for Reiter's hitting set algorithm for finding all or a few leading minimal diagnoses using two different conflict detection techniques. Furthermore, we perform initial experiments for a basic depth-first search strategy to assess the potential of parallelization when searching for one single diagnosis. Finally, we test the effects of parallelizing "direct encodings" of the diagnosis problem in a constraint solver.
